My daughter has been memorizing portions of the epic
poem “Horatius at the Bridge” in her third grade class, as my son did three
years ago when he was in third grade. I have delighted in this great poem as I’ve
heard my children recite its lilting verse, but I did not fully grasp its
significance until recently.
G. K. Chesterton says,
All romances consist of
three characters… For the sake of argument they may be called St. George and
the Dragon and the Princess. In every romance there must be the twin elements
of loving and fighting. In every romance there must be the three characters:
there must be the Princess, who is a thing to be loved; there must be the
Dragon, who is a thing to be fought; and there must be St. George, who is a
thing that both loves and fights. … [T]he philosophers of today have started to
divide loving from fighting and to put them into opposite camps. [But] the two
things imply each other; they implied each other in the old romance and in the
old religion, which were the two permanent things of humanity. You cannot love
a thing without wanting to fight for it. You cannot fight without something to
fight for. To love a thing without wishing to fight for it is not love at all .
. . (Appreciations and Criticism of the Works
of Charles Dickens, CW 15:255)*
After reading these words, I revisited Horatius with
fresh eyes. I now see Horatius as a man who first of all loves, and then fights. He is a man honored
and revered not only for his courage, but because he fights for what he loves.
Consider his rallying speech:
But he saw on Palatinus
|
|
The white porch of his
home;
|
|
And he spake to the noble river
|
|
That rolls by the
towers of Rome:
|
|
Horatius
fights for his home, his way of life. This is a beautiful image. The above picture
of Horatius is my favorite (of his many depictions) because, amidst the
battle, it seems to capture his love and longing for his home. After this
moment of reflection he hurls himself, injured, into the raging current, and makes it
back to his beloved home after risking his life to protect it. He has defeated the
dragon and saved the princess.
Chesterton
and Horatius prompt us to consider that what we love is worth fighting for.
This is why, as Dale Ahlquist says, “it is common sense to be a romantic.” After
a hiatus of 6 years from my blog, my decision to return was prompted
largely by this image of the common sense romance. Several years of studying
philosophy reinforced to me the importance of defending what I love. My new
blog name, “At the Bridge,” reflects a desire to preserve the vision of human
flourishing that I love, and that is founded upon truth. In keeping with the classical tradition, I anticipate that this journey will involve exploring
and sharing the good stories of good men and women, who remind us of eternal
truths. Like Horatius.
*I am
grateful to Dale Ahlquist for introducing me to some Chesterton works I might
not have read otherwise. This quotation was taken from his book Common Sense 101: Lessons from G. K.
Chesterton, which I highly recommend.
No comments:
Post a Comment